The Communication Initiative Network

Where communication and media are central to social and economic development

GLOBAL| Approaches| Tools| Issues| Regions/Countries| MDGs| Polls / Discussions

E-magazines

Upcoming Events


Average Rating: no ratings submitted

CRITIQUES OF THE DOMINANT PARADIGM

Summary

Family Tree of Theories, Methodologies & Strategies in Development Communication: Convergences & Differences



CRITIQUES OF THE DOMINANT PARADIGM


Beginning in the late 1960s, the field of development communication split in two broad approaches: one that revised but largely continued the premises and goals of modernization and diffusion theories, and another that has championed a participatory view of communication in contrast to information- and behavior-centered theories. Both approaches have dominated the field. Although in recent years there have been attempts to incorporate insights from both traditions, no comprehensive view has evolved (Servaes 1996). Integrative attempts are analyzed in the last section of this report.


a. Dependancy Theory

b. Participatory theories and approaches

c. Media advocacy

d. Social mobilization


keywords: change theories

social change




Placed on the Communication Initiative site August 30 2001
Last Updated August 30 2001

How useful did you find this page to your work?

1 - not useful    5 - very useful

Feel free to leave us comments

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Help Seed The CI Network

Login / Register

Subscribe to The Drum Beat, Contribute to Forums, Get Poll Results etc
New to CI? » Start here

Development Classifieds

Impact of Obama?

What will the impact of an Obama United States Presidency be for more effective action on poverty and other international development priorities? [Please explain your reasons in the comments field.]