Knowledge SectionsE-magazinesThe CI PartnersClassifiedsAbout UsUpcoming Events |
Average Rating: no ratings submitted
Combatting Antivaccination Rumours - Uganda - BackgroundSummaryEastern and Southern Africa Regional Office United Nations Childrens Fund Nairobi, Kenya Uganda - Summary Points
Remarkably, there is much evidence to show that declines in Uganda's immunisation programme predated the FM radio scares, and that these scares, though widely discussed, had little if any quantifiable impact on the polio campaigns.
Located on the equator, Uganda is bordered by Sudan, Kenya, Tanzania, Rwanda and Zaire. Nearly 90 percent of Uganda's population lives in rural areas. The country's largest population centres are in rural areas. In the early 1990's, Uganda began decentralising government services to give more decision-making power to local jurisdictions. This political process has involved creating new districts, which now number 56, an increase from 39 in 1997. According to the Local Chairman V (LC V) interviewed in Ntungamo District, the "power, resources, and responsibility have moved from the centre to rural areas." The vaccination programme in Uganda started in 1963 with polio and smallpox in 1968. The reign of Idi Amin, 1971 to 1979, led to massive cuts in basic health services. By 1980, BCG coverage, 70 percent before his seizure of power, had dropped to one percent.[1] After his demise, a vast effort to relaunch vaccinations was cosponsored by the new government, with NGO and UN assistance. The Uganda Expanded Programme on Immunisation (UNEPI) began in 1983, with support from UNICEF, Save the Children Fund, and the WHO. Immunisation made slow progress until 1986, by which time most areas of the country had become secure.[2] In 1988, Uganda voted for polio eradication. The country has not seen a case of polio since 1996. In 1988 Uganda supported the World Health Assembly's resolution to eradicate polio by 2000. In 1995, Uganda began planning for its first NIDs in 1996. In its 1996 report on its first National Immunisation Days, UNEPI reported that it had achieved about 75 to 80 percent coverage in routine immunisation in most remote areas of the country. However, the following table, given in a press briefing to kick off the 2001 SNIDs, shows coverage for polio coverage in 1996 to have been more than 95 percent and shows coverage in the mass campaigns since1996.[3] Results of National Polio Campaigns, 1996 – 2000, and Absence of Impact from FM Radio Antivaccination Campaigns
Note: After the start of the media blitz, NIDS vaccinations rose from 4.4 to 4.6 million. Constraints to the mass polio immunisation campaign were noted in a 1996 report. They included problems with refrigeration and vaccine storage (cold chain), late and insufficient funding, rumours, and limited time. Other constraints included the following:
All these subsidiary factors were later to feed into the official reaction to the rumour campaign. Structures hard pressed to deal with the predictable challenges of planning and managing mass campaigns were hard pressed to deal with the wild card of antivaccination rumours. Programme communication was done, but not always to a high standard. As in other countries, there was an emphasis on mass media and printed materials, and little effort was made in the early stages of the NIDs to target health workers themselves, who were thought to be loyal supporters of the government initiative. The 1996 NIDS report notes that social mobilisation was targeted at all levels of the population, and mass media were used effectively to promote NIDs, especially through a variety of radio programmes. Government run Radio Uganda and Capital Radio were used extensively. In addition to mass media, many print materials were produced, but these later proved inadequate because they were in English, a language not read by most Ugandans. To counter negative rumour campaigns, health officials used current affairs and other popular radio programmes, including live call-in programmes, for answering questions and doubts expressed by the public and putting down rumours. The 1996 report does not specify who was spreading rumours against polio vaccination. The 1997 report on NIDs states that health workers did not participate in the planning of 1996 NIDs. As a result, most of them did not support NIDs. According to this report, some health workers had doubts and misgivings and openly campaigned against NIDs. In some areas of the country, they tried to discourage clients from immunising their children, and the health workers themselves did not take their children for immunisation.[4] In 1997, as in 1996, UNEPI conducted intense community mobilisation. At the same time, deliberate attention was given to health workers. Senior medical officers and other health workers from Mulago Hospital, as well as other government and NGO hospitals, were involved in planning for 1997 NIDs. A number of sensitisation meetings targeted health workers at all levels and a booklet titled “National Immunisation Days in Uganda – A Guide for Health Workers” was prepared and distributed.[5] The scheduled dates for NIDs were changed from December and January (1996-97) to August and September in 1997. It was this change in timing, well indicated on programme grounds, which led to the coincidence in time of the vaccination campaign and the malaria season, which peaks in August. One official questioned about the scheduling change said that he thought the change was implemented when the East Africa countries – Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda – co-ordinated their NIDs efforts. In the first round of NIDs in 1997 eight districts of the central and eastern regions showed low coverage, covering under 75 percent of the targeted children. The 1997 report says that lowered coverage might be the result of:
By 1998, officials were concerned with the continuing decline in routine immunisation, a trend that dated from 1994, before the NIDs, and was largely related to changes in funding and administration of vaccination services. As a result, the Ministry of Health (Ministry of Health) commissioned a KAP study, published in 1998, to investigate the causes of the perceived decline in routine immunisation coverage.[8] The Executive Summary to the KAP study notes that “most players in the programme seem to agree that there is a decline in immunisation coverage nationally although this is not backed by detailed data because it is scanty.” The KAP study quotes a senior officer from UNICEF: “There seems to be no data at hand to substantiate decline.” The KAP study does not say why data was not available.
1 National Immunisation Days 1996 Final Report. 1996. Ministry of Health. Uganda. 2 National Immunisation Days 1996 Final Report. 1996. Ministry of Health. Uganda. 3 A Brief to the Press by Hon. Minister of Health. Figures provided by UNEPI. 4 National Immunisation Days 1997 Final Report. 1997. Ministry of Health. Uganda. 5 National Immunisation Days 1997 Final Report. 1997. Ministry of Health. Uganda. 6 National Immunisation Days 1997 Final Report. 1997. Ministry of Health. Uganda. 7 National Immunisation Days 1997 Final Report. 1997. Ministry of Health. Uganda. 8 KAP Study Report on Immunisation Services in Uganda. 1998. Health Management Consult Uganda funded by UNICEF. P. 15. Click here to go back to the table of contents, or navigate above by clicking on "next page". Placed on the Communication Initiative site July 18 2002 Last Updated July 18 2002 |
Login / RegisterImpact of Obama?What will the impact of an Obama United States Presidency be for more effective action on poverty and other international development priorities? [Please explain your reasons in the comments field.]
Development News |