Knowledge SectionsE-magazinesThe CI PartnersClassifiedsAbout UsUpcoming Events |
Average Rating: no ratings submitted
Communication approaches & strategies on HIV/AIDSSummary2.1 Communication approaches and strategies on HIV/AIDS: what's new, what's not? The last two years have seen intense debate over different approaches to HIV/AIDS communication. In particular, there has been a growing questioning of social marketing and behaviour change oriented communication, and increased interest and debate focused in the field of Communication for Social Change, an approach to communication that focuses less on changing individual behaviours and more on empowering communities and societies to tackle the underlying issues of discrimination, poverty and marginalisation that are driving the epidemic in the first place. As these issues are closely related to the substance of the Roundtable, this section seeks to explain some of the main issues involved. Two developments in particular have focused debate on this area, the first the publication of a new framework on Communication produced by UNAIDS, the second the work of the Rockefeller Foundation in this area. 2.1.1 UNAIDS New Communication Framework This UNAIDS framework was published in December 1999 following an intensive process of detailed consultations in Asia, Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean and internationally. Its conclusions were that: Based on a review of the literature and of experiences in the field, most current theories and models [of HIV communication programming] did not provide an adequate foundation on which to develop communications interventions for HIV/AIDS in the regions... Participants at five consultative workshops (two global and three regional) noted the inadequacy and limitations of current theories and the models derived from them. Chief among the weaknesses identified were:
"The UNAIDS framework calls for refocusing communication interventions on the basis of five key contextual domains: (1) government policy, (2) socio-economic status, (3) culture, (4) gender relations, and (5) spirituality. These contextual domains, while they lie outside the control of individuals, have a significant influence on their HIV/AIDS-related health behaviours. In essence, the UNAIDS framework calls for moving away from individual-level theories and models of preventive health behaviours (health belief models, theory of reasoned action, stages of change, hierarchy of effects model, social cognitive theory, diffusion of innovations, and others) to more multilevel, cultural, and contextual explanations and interventions (McKinlay & Marceau, 1999; 2000)" 2.1.2 The Rockefeller Foundation Communication for Social Change Network: behaviour change depends on social change The findings of the UNAIDS report strongly echoed the work and conclusions of a network facilitated by the Rockefeller Foundation which brings together communications actors and experts, ranging from grassroots and community based NGOs through to international NGOs and major multilateral and bilateral organisations. The Foundation's conclusions argue that while mass education campaigns aimed at changing individual behaviour play an essential role in AIDS prevention, they are highly unlikely to be successful or sustainable unless they are accompanied by deep-rooted social changes which will only result from internally driven change processes, including informed and inclusive public debate. Many millions of dollars have been spent on individually targeted education campaigns, and many of these campaigns have had important impacts. Increasingly, however, concern is mounting that these campaigns are at best insufficient, in achieving the kind of long term, sustainable and rooted changes in society that are required for HIV/AIDS to be confronted.
Further details of this thinking can be found on the Roundtable (www.comminit.com/roundtable2/), The Communication Initiative (www.comminit.com) and Rockefeller Foundation (www.rockfound.org) websites. (2) Singhal, Arvind, HIV/AIDS and Communication for Behaviour and Social Change: Programme Experiences, Examples and Ways Forward, International Workshop, UNAIDS, Department of Policy and Strategy, July 2000 Placed on the Communication Initiative site August 22 2003 Last Updated August 22 2003 |
Login / RegisterImpact of Obama?What will the impact of an Obama United States Presidency be for more effective action on poverty and other international development priorities? [Please explain your reasons in the comments field.]
Development News |