Democracy and Governance

Where communication and media are central to Democracy and Governance


Average Rating: no ratings submitted

The Right to Information in Latin America


A Comparative Legal Survey

Author

Toby Mendel

ARTICLE 19

Publication Date

January 1, 2009

Summary

This book on the “Right to Information in Latin America” is written to help clarify some of the tensions and challenges of drafting or promoting legislation guaranteeing the right to information. It uses a Latin American regional, comparative perspective. More specifically, it illustrates the approaches taken to enacting right to information legislation in eleven Latin American countries. It provides a study of the law and practice regarding the right to information in Latin America, and offers an analysis of what is working and why. This publication builds on a companion book, Freedom of Information: A Comparative Legal Survey, previously published by the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).

Since 2003, as stated here, new and more emphatic statements to the effect that access to information held by public bodies is a fundamental human right have been issued. Especially significant in the Latin American region, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights has held that the general right to freedom of expression, as guaranteed under international law, encompasses the right to information. International bodies with responsibility for promoting and protecting human rights, including the United Nations, regional human rights bodies and mechanisms at the Organization of American States, the Council of Europe, the Commonwealth, and the African Union, have authoritatively recognised the fundamental human right to access information held by public bodies, as well as the need for effective legislation to secure respect for that right in practice. The author cites the specific documents for each organisation that contain language pertaining to the right to information.

From the declarations, for example Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), treaties, such as International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), and other documents of record, these are a selection of statements that have influence on the formation of principles on the right to information and their regulation. (For the sources of these, please see the International Standards and Trends section of the document.):

  • "They [those responsible for drafting international human rights treaties] recognised the important social role of not just freedom to express oneself - freedom to speak - but also of the more profound notion of a free flow of information and ideas in society. They recognised the importance of protecting not only the speaker, but also the recipient of information. This recognition is now being understood as including the right to information in the sense of the right to request and be given access to information held by public bodies."
  • "The right to access information held by public authorities is a fundamental human right... based on the principle of maximum disclosure..."
  • "Every person has the right to seek and receive information, express opinions and disseminate them freely. No one may restrict or deny these rights.... The authorities must be compelled by law to make available in a timely and reasonable manner the information generated by the public sector..."
  • "Freedom of information should be guaranteed as a legal and enforceable right permitting every individual to obtain records and information held by the executive, the legislative and the judicial arms of the state, as well as any government owned corporation and any other body carrying out public functions."
  • "Public bodies hold information not for themselves but as custodians of the public good and everyone has a right to access this information, subject only to clearly defined rules established by law..."

The principles of a right to information regime include: maximum disclosure; obligation to publish; promotion of open government; limited scope of exceptions; processes to facilitate access; costs; open meetings; disclosure takes precedent; and protection of whistleblowers. The document discusses progress in the 11 countries and compares approaches on the right to access, procedural guarantees, duty to publish, exceptions, appeals, sanctions and protections, and promotional measures.

The document concludes that specific principles derived from international standards on the right to information are a strong presumption in favour of access; good procedural means by which the right may be exercised, including through proactive publication obligations; a clear and narrow regime of exceptions; and the right to appeal breaches of the rules to independent oversight bodies. "Beyond these (still quite general) principles, the now considerable practice of different States in giving effect to the right to information in law serves as an important body of knowledge both for those promoting the adoption of a law for the first time and for those reviewing their existing law and practice with a view to reforming it."


Contact

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)

Casa UNESCO
Veintimilla 450, entre las Plaza y Tamayo

Quito
Ecuador
Tel: (+593 2) 2528911 / 2520623
Fax: (+593 2) 2567305

Related Summaries

Source

IFEX Communiqué, Vol. 18 No. 29, on July 22 2009.


Placed on the Communication Initiative site August 06 2009
Last Updated August 07 2009



How useful did you find the knowledge and contacts on this page to your work?


0
No votes yet
Your rating: None

RIGHT TO INFORMATION/COMMUNICATION IN BRAZIL

You ought to know that air wave communications in Brazil, despite been legally public and been in public domain is hardly respected by radio and TV groups which restrict themselves either to political faction mildly subtle, open and irrestricted publicity, or religious pseudo-mystical garbage, all transmitted to millions of Brazilians all over the wide country, night and day to the benefit of a small number of local, regional or even national business and political entities that by and large retain the power of this transmission either through strong congressional lobbying, or plainly topical control of all electronic information sources and emissions.
Journalism in such conditions become a true act of god (in the insurance industry terminology) or by rare circunstances.
Despite of all pressures, cooptations and coertions there still is a number of freethinking individuals who stop this process short and attempt alternative ways of informing people, however, they are also a bit too biased, naturally, in the other direction.
In a few words, bare and square Brazilian newscasting or journalism in whichever media, is a rare phenomena.
Brazilian peoples, whom much slowly seem
to be emerging from obscuringly dark informational/comunicational aeras, largely because of partial or total analphabetism, another phenomena that is quite hard to handle within the cannons of laws, has been led to further obscurantist ideas from local terminal radios and TV stations' authorities, propped by land owners and big business, who require large amounts of docile and ignorant people to plainly enslave with lousy wages, horrible working conditions, awful quality industrial produce and the lure of getting rich by means of winning lotteries which now are quite abundant.
This should be object of further clear studies in Communication. This should be object, furthermore, of change, of putting people's heads in the right direction, not that of easy lousy quasi-sexual entertainment or the showing of psychological abnormalcies of populations by the lowd, clear and frequent trumpeting of it, as if it were gods true and desire.
Most straight-head Brazilians with a minimum understanding are reclaiming this new stance of local communications moguls and companies which survive on such depiction of our miseries and hipocrisies, the time for a 'basta' has come.

Help Seed The CI Network

Jobs and more...

Effective Representation

Which of the following is most important for effective representation of the interests of marginalised groups?