| Advanced Search |
The CI PartnersClassifiedsAbout Us |
Average Rating: no ratings submitted
The Right to Information in Latin AmericaA Comparative Legal SurveyAuthorToby Mendel
ARTICLE 19 Publication DateJanuary 1, 2009
SummaryThis book on the “Right to Information in Latin America” is written to help clarify some of the tensions and challenges of drafting or promoting legislation guaranteeing the right to information. It uses a Latin American regional, comparative perspective. More specifically, it illustrates the approaches taken to enacting right to information legislation in eleven Latin American countries. It provides a study of the law and practice regarding the right to information in Latin America, and offers an analysis of what is working and why. This publication builds on a companion book, Freedom of Information: A Comparative Legal Survey, previously published by the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). Since 2003, as stated here, new and more emphatic statements to the effect that access to information held by public bodies is a fundamental human right have been issued. Especially significant in the Latin American region, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights has held that the general right to freedom of expression, as guaranteed under international law, encompasses the right to information. International bodies with responsibility for promoting and protecting human rights, including the United Nations, regional human rights bodies and mechanisms at the Organization of American States, the Council of Europe, the Commonwealth, and the African Union, have authoritatively recognised the fundamental human right to access information held by public bodies, as well as the need for effective legislation to secure respect for that right in practice. The author cites the specific documents for each organisation that contain language pertaining to the right to information. From the declarations, for example Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), treaties, such as International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), and other documents of record, these are a selection of statements that have influence on the formation of principles on the right to information and their regulation. (For the sources of these, please see the International Standards and Trends section of the document.):
The principles of a right to information regime include: maximum disclosure; obligation to publish; promotion of open government; limited scope of exceptions; processes to facilitate access; costs; open meetings; disclosure takes precedent; and protection of whistleblowers. The document discusses progress in the 11 countries and compares approaches on the right to access, procedural guarantees, duty to publish, exceptions, appeals, sanctions and protections, and promotional measures. The document concludes that specific principles derived from international standards on the right to information are a strong presumption in favour of access; good procedural means by which the right may be exercised, including through proactive publication obligations; a clear and narrow regime of exceptions; and the right to appeal breaches of the rules to independent oversight bodies. "Beyond these (still quite general) principles, the now considerable practice of different States in giving effect to the right to information in law serves as an important body of knowledge both for those promoting the adoption of a law for the first time and for those reviewing their existing law and practice with a view to reforming it." ContactUnited Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)
Casa UNESCO
Quito
Ecuador
Tel: (+593 2) 2528911 / 2520623
Fax: (+593 2) 2567305
Related SummariesSourceIFEX Communiqué, Vol. 18 No. 29, on July 22 2009. Placed on the Communication Initiative site August 06 2009 Last Updated August 07 2009 How useful did you find the knowledge and contacts on this page to your work? Post your comments (review comments from others below): |
Special FocusEffective Representation
Which of the following is most important for effective representation of the interests of marginalised groups?
|
RIGHT TO INFORMATION/COMMUNICATION IN BRAZIL
You ought to know that air wave communications in Brazil, despite been legally public and been in public domain is hardly respected by radio and TV groups which restrict themselves either to political faction mildly subtle, open and irrestricted publicity, or religious pseudo-mystical garbage, all transmitted to millions of Brazilians all over the wide country, night and day to the benefit of a small number of local, regional or even national business and political entities that by and large retain the power of this transmission either through strong congressional lobbying, or plainly topical control of all electronic information sources and emissions.
Journalism in such conditions become a true act of god (in the insurance industry terminology) or by rare circunstances.
Despite of all pressures, cooptations and coertions there still is a number of freethinking individuals who stop this process short and attempt alternative ways of informing people, however, they are also a bit too biased, naturally, in the other direction.
In a few words, bare and square Brazilian newscasting or journalism in whichever media, is a rare phenomena.
Brazilian peoples, whom much slowly seem
to be emerging from obscuringly dark informational/comunicational aeras, largely because of partial or total analphabetism, another phenomena that is quite hard to handle within the cannons of laws, has been led to further obscurantist ideas from local terminal radios and TV stations' authorities, propped by land owners and big business, who require large amounts of docile and ignorant people to plainly enslave with lousy wages, horrible working conditions, awful quality industrial produce and the lure of getting rich by means of winning lotteries which now are quite abundant.
This should be object of further clear studies in Communication. This should be object, furthermore, of change, of putting people's heads in the right direction, not that of easy lousy quasi-sexual entertainment or the showing of psychological abnormalcies of populations by the lowd, clear and frequent trumpeting of it, as if it were gods true and desire.
Most straight-head Brazilians with a minimum understanding are reclaiming this new stance of local communications moguls and companies which survive on such depiction of our miseries and hipocrisies, the time for a 'basta' has come.