| Advanced Search |
The CI PartnersClassifiedsAbout Us |
Average Rating: no ratings submitted
Women's Leadership and Participation: OverviewAuthorJoanna Hoare
Fiona Gell
Publication DateFebruary 1, 2008
Summary
This 19-page paper offers background, context, and motivation for the Oxfam Great Britain (GB) publication "Learning for Action on Women's Leadership and Participation". To begin, the authors explore the multiple dimensions of economically poor women's experience of marginalisation. They are often denied a voice within the already-disenfranchised states, markets, communities, and households in which they live, dominated as they are by men and male interests. This lack of voice, Oxfam explains, exacerbates gender inequality and poverty, effectively blocking women's access to - let alone opportunity to lead - decision-making and agenda-setting processes. Action to make women visible politically as women and empowering them to act in that capacity can, according to these authors result in more equitable policy outcomes because it is likely to encourage policymakers to give more attention to issues affecting women, such as equal pay, better conditions of employment, child-care, violence against women, and unpaid labour. As the authors explain, international human rights treaties and conventions such as the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), the Beijing Platform for Action, and the third Millennium Development Goal (MDG) on gender equality, recognise that women have the right to participate equally with men at all levels and in all aspects of public life and decision-making. Despite these commitments, Oxfam indicates, women continue to be under-represented in all areas of decision-making and face significant barriers to their full and equal participation. With these concerns as a driving force, Oxfam GB and its partners have been developing initiatives around the world, such as the 8 described in the publication that this overview chapter introduces. The authors offer a more detailed backdrop, starting with women's presence in economic institutions. Amongst the data provided in this section: 14% of finance ministers are female; at the World Bank and International Monetary Fund, women comprise around 20% of leadership staff and under 10% of governors; 25 out of the top 1,000 multinational corporations are run by women; and, while women make up nearly 40% of the global paid workforce, they earn only 26% of the world's income. Furthermore, women "carry the overwhelming burden of unpaid reproductive labour and caring work". A similar situation characterises political institutions. While there are glimmers of hope, globally: 17.4% of national political representatives are female; 15 out of 193 countries worldwide have achieved 30% women in national governments; and 3.5% of senior ministerial positions are held by women. Even "in the regional and sub-regional government institutions which often play an important role in determining access to essential services and resources, women remain conspicuous by their absence." According to Oxfam, even in non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and community-based organisations, "women are much less likely to be leaders than men, and women's shared interests are less likely to be on the agenda." According to Oxfam, there are many factors which constrain the ability of women - particularly economically poor women - to participate on an equal footing with men. To cite only one example: Lack of education and low levels of literacy make access to information difficult and commonly undermine the confidence and skills needed to enter public life. Women are also less likely than men to have the networks, contacts, and social and professional experience expected of public leaders. Oxfam has learned that carrying out "gender audits" - for instance, research into how a particular issue or policy is impacting on women's well-being - are an important way of assessing what factors are limiting women's opportunities for participation. In broad terms, Oxfam has identified three areas which need to be tackled; the next sections of the document examine each of these aspects in greater depth, drawing examples from the case studies included in the series. In brief: 1) Overcoming structural barriers:
2) Encouraging and supporting women to take up leadership roles or participate in decision-making on an equal footing with men: Providing targeted training to women who want to assume positions of leadership is one way of enabling more women to influence decision-making processes. Several of the papers in this collection give examples, and also highlight the importance of ongoing training, post-election. Oxfam asserts that, beyond developing women's capacities to lead, there is a need to transform models of leadership development so that they become more gender-responsive, and include issues such as participatory governance and inclusive dialogue. 3) Supporting women and men to carry out leadership roles which challenge inequalities of wealth and power and recognise and promote women's rights: As indicated by several of the case studies, increasing numbers of women in positions of power has had a direct, beneficial impact on the welfare of women living in poverty at the local level. But not all formal mechanisms to increase the profile of women automatically have this outcome. In addition, Oxfam cautions against assuming that all progressive women politicians are gender-aware, and/or that they will incorporate women's rights and gender-equality issues into their agendas in a meaningful way. Recognising this, Oxfam GB's partners' work in Honduras has included building alliances between those congresswomen who are keen to promote women's rights and gender equality, and women's rights organisations. Another approach has been the adoption of local "pacts", or "protocols". In Haiti and Honduras, Oxfam GB's partner organisations facilitated meetings between voters and female and male candidates, where the former had a chance to voice their concerns and demands. Representatives from women's rights organisations were also invited to attend. At the end of the meetings, candidates formally signed a pledge to address the priorities identified by their constituents in the event of being elected. In conclusion, the authors stress that "Programmes aimed at strengthening women's leadership and participation will have limited impact unless the structures that uphold gender inequality, and other forms of inequality, begin to change." This requires bringing men on board at all levels to challenge: unrepresentative governance and electoral systems that are not accountable to voters; organisational structures that reinforce male control and influence; and the economic discrimination that women face. Some of the principles that need to guide this work which have emerged through the experience of running the Oxfam programmes discussed in these case studies are:
"Perhaps most significant to overcoming gender inequality, and the other forms of inequality and discrimination that keep women in poverty, is the work that feminist and women's rights organisations are already doing to articulate the needs of poor women, and to push for their strategic interests to be met." ContactHelen Moreno
Online Communications Executive, Policy and Practice Communications Team
Oxfam Publishing
Oxfam House
Oxford
OX4 2JY
United Kingdom (UK)
Tel: 44 0 1865 472208
Related SummariesSourceEmail from Helen Moreno to The Communication Initiative on February 24 2009. Placed on the Communication Initiative site July 10 2009 Last Updated August 26 2009 How useful did you find the knowledge and contacts on this page to your work? Post your comments (review comments from others below):COMMENTS POSTED |
Special FocusNewspapers and Democracy
How central to democracy are newspapers - some of which are being lost to budget cuts and other changes - as opposed to blogs, YouTube, emails, text messaging, twittering, and the like?
|