ClassifiedsMexico XVII - Communication |
Average Rating: 3.33 out of 5 (3 ratings submitted)
Communication Art!Executive Director, The Communication Initiative December 1 2003 Summary[* Originally published within the electronic publication, The Drum Beat - click here for archives.] Well, after a series of Strategy Drum Beats that one friend described as helpful if a little grumpy [great to have friends isn't it?] and at the beginning of a week in which we are hearing mainly very bad news about HIV/AIDS [more infections up in more countries], let's focus on some good news for a change. And that good news is [trumpets sounding] local creativity! In the face of overwhelming problems, with very little money but with an abundance of ideas, skills, energy and motivation, local and national groups can creatively make a real difference with their communication. But this good news comes with a little tension - a tension that has considerable implications for development communication. Before highlighting this 'wrinkle' let's enjoy the creativity with a small selection of recent initiatives we have been honoured to communicate through The CI process:
There are many more examples - this is only a brief selection. I have no idea how many of these programmes developed. My instinct tells me that they came from a creative idea - someone thought it up and did it with very short processes like: Why don't I strap a lap top on my bike? Hey - let's send postcards to all employers. Can we explore resolving conflict through dance? I am going to draw on condoms. Now if we can just link the solar power to the shortwave and the onto the computer - bingo - email in one of the most remote parts of earth! The very fact that they are very imaginative raises an age old question - is communication art or science? And by extension is development communication art or science? It is an important issue for the way in which our field develops and decides what activities and strategies it will undertake. Presently in development communication the strong trend and pressure is towards treating communication as a science. There are considerable pressures to engage in formal planning processes, agree evaluation indicators, recruit trained staff and root our work in acknowledged change theories. [Including such suggestions from these pages on many occasions!]. Deliberation and detailed planning seem to hold sway over instinct and creative insight. You are much more likely to get a project approved and launched [not to mention funded] in a development organisation if the "correct' planning processes have been followed than if you walk into someone's office and say 'any chance of helping me to do art with condoms or work on a learning circus for the mind or strap a lap top on the back of my motorbike?". The correct planning processes are of course designed to instill thoroughness and ensure relevance, sustainability and efficient use of resources. But you do have to wonder if sometimes [often?] those processes do not squeeze the art - and therefore the resonance and power - from much of our development communication. Perhaps we have gone one focus group or one Performance Based Results form too far? The evidence [to use that word very loosely] that we may have left too much art out of development communication is all around us in our personal experiences. The songs that you hum [or sing if your voice is better than mine - not difficult] did not go through a development communication planning process. When I was on the beach in my home town in New Zealand and heard John Lennon sing "you may say I'm a dreamer" and all that went before and after those words, I did not know that he did not have a focus group to test those words. Actually the thought never occurred to me! But that song had real power and influence. Here you can now insert your own recollection from your culture. When I was in ....and heard....it....We can do the same game with film and art, TV shows and poetry, books and theatre. They manage to move people emotionally, inform and crucially spark debate, dialogue and discussion. Those three components of emotions, information and debate/dialogue are vital aspects for effective development communication. When you think of great art it has those qualities. Of course we do not all have John Lennons in our neighbourhoods and communities. But there is an abundance of creativity and talent. And there is lots that people want to voice through their art. Much that they want to contribute to the emotions, information and dialogue/debate around them. Perhaps an important part of our jobs as development communicators is to ensure that that artistic talent gets it's space and time - without being squeezed by the procedures and policies of international development. Not every effort will be successful [what ever success may mean - this will be the theme of a future strategy Drum Beat]. Of course not. But then not every properly planned, thoroughly designed, focus group tested, performance based results completed communication intervention will be successful. In fact many seem to struggle. It is not like we have made a final discovery about the best way to "do" development communication. So, maybe we should rebalance a little bit - give the artistic insight and power a little more development space. Drive on motor bike lap top. Boot up virtual brain circuses. Stage front modern dance and conflict. Roll on condom art. Warren Feek Placed on the Communication Initiative site January 12 2005 Last Updated January 12 2005 |
Register and ParticipateUser loginPollHIV/AIDS News |