| Advanced Search
|
Understanding Operational Barriers to Family Planning Services in Conflict-Affected Countries: Experiences from Sierra LeoneAuthorEmily Sonneveldt
Theresa Shaver
Anita Bhuyan
Constella Futures (Sonneveldt, Bhuyan), White Ribbon Alliance (Shaver) Publication DateAugust 1, 2008
SummaryThis February - May 2007 study highlights issues affecting provision of family planning (FP) in conflict-affected settings, using experiences in Sierra Leone as the focus from which to derive lessons on refugee/internally displaced persons (IDP) family planning needs; barriers to quality, accessible services; policy actions to overcome barriers; and capacity building of local groups to recognise and analyse barriers. According to the study, the adoption and implementation of appropriate "operational policies" can alleviate barriers to healthcare until international community guidelines and protocols on refugee/IDP health needs are met through national policy and guideline development. The document notes that the range of complementary reproductive health (RH) services (e.g., safe motherhood, prevention of gender-based violence, HIV/sexually transmitted infection (STI) prevention) are essential and have been identified as part of the Minimum Initial Services Package (MISP) for reproductive health in crisis situations. The three primary study sites in Sierra Leone included the camp and surrounding community near Bo town; the Largo camp and community in Kenema District; and Lungi community in Port Loko District. The study gathered information through focus group discussions, a "Journey of a Woman" exercise using drawing of pictures of participant stories of their families - before, during, and after the conflict (the 3 stages of study applied here), key informant and provider interviews, and the POLICY project Policy Environment Score (PES) to assess the degree to which the policy environment facilitates access to high-quality FP/RH services. The report details women's and men's responses on FP at the three stages of study. Responses show increased availability of condoms with the presence of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) both during and after the conflict, and increased FP services after the conflict, though clinics were reportedly hampered by stockouts of medicines of up to one month. Reports varied on barriers such as price, and some women reported going to local markets for lower priced FP products such as injectable contraceptives. Barriers to FP included lack of availability in the immediate post conflict stage, limited knowledge of contraceptive use, particularly among IDP women, inability to travel to hospitals, and restrictions on FP access for single women, adolescents, and women with low parity. Some refugee women reported learning from programmes on sensitisation to the need for FP, provided by national and international organisations. The document suggests the following barriers, in addition to costs and stockout problems: lack of community-based distribution; shortage of trained reproductive health specialists; inability/unwillingness of providers to recommend different contraceptive options if the client experiences side effects; long wait times and poor treatment at health facilities; condom promotion that is limited to HIV prevention; and greater attention needed for men’s reproductive health issues. Recommendations for stakeholders include:
ContactHealth Policy Initiative
Futures Group International
Washington DC
20005
United States
Tel: (202) 775 9680
Fax: (202) 775 9694
SourceDEC Express listserv on March 5 2009. Placed on the Communication Initiative site March 18 2009 Last Updated May 19 2009 How useful did you find the knowledge and contacts on this page to your work? Post your comments (review comments from others below): |
Special FocusThe CI Partners |