Theory Summary:
Greed, Conventional Wisdom, Conservatism, Ignorance, Imagination, Hunches, Sloppiness, Wild Ideas, Pig-Headedness, Anarchy, Jealousy, Inspiration, Persistence, Laziness, Incompetence, Care, Ambition, Competence, Wisdom, DedicationUndergraduate Education / Graduate Training
![]() |
"WHAT WILL THEY THINK?" *Proposal reviewing. *Grant funding. |
FRONTIER SCIENCE
Bright Ideas, Silly Ideas, Ingenuity, Hunches, Trial and Error, Quick and Dirty Experiments
Mixed Motives, Ruthlessness, Stubborness, Conflicts of Interest, Generosity, Luck, Cutting Corners, Ideosyncracy
![]() |
"CAN THIS GET PUBLISHED?" *Replicate and clean up. *Seminars and preprints. *Editors and referees. |
PRIMARY LITERATURE
Research Papers, Putative Science, Abstracts
Mostly Not Obviously Wrong, Might Be Right
![]() |
*Testing and use by others. *Modification and extension. *Citation of useful work. |
SECONDARY LITERATURE
*Review Articles, Monographs
*Mostly Reliable
![]() |
*Time. *Use by others. *Concordance with other fields. |
TEXTBOOK SCIENCE
Mostly Very Reliable
![]() |
*Time. *Use by others. *Connections among sciences. |
TEXTBOOKS OF THE FUTURE
Work Well

In stages, deficiencies are eliminated by virtue of the social institutions that science has evolved, peer review in particular.
Source:
from Scott Ratzan's presentation to CHANGE mini-forum, January 1999. Contact Scott Ratzan sratzan@smtp.aed.org




