Is educational broadcasting finished?
Author
Jim Stevenson
Chief Executive, The Educational Broadcasting Services Trust
Summary
This article explores global trends related to educational broadcasting. Stevenson observes that in many parts of the world this type of communication is flourishing, pointing out that these areas are typically plagued by significant social problems. In South Africa, for instance, radio instruction has been implemented for out-of-school children in Zambia; television, live drama and music, discussions, and printed materials (newspapers and magazines) are other strategies used to address challenges like ill health or illiteracy.
However, while educational broadcasting is far from finished, Stevenson points out that in some countries - particularly developed countries - this type of broadcasting is often threatened by commercial pressures. "When the problems are great and the medium new", he says, "educational broadcasting grows. Then after some years it declines". A chart illustrates this downward trend in Japan, comparing figures from 1990 and 2000 in elementary schools (95.1% versus 91.7%), nursery schools (77% versus 66.1%), kindergartens (65.8% versus 44.5%), senior high schools (57.4% versus 30.3%), and junior high schools (40.1% versus 17.9%).
Stevenson attributes this trend to enhanced resources in schools (in the United Kingdom, for example). The development of computer-based technologies has obviated the need to listen to a live broadcast. This, he says, despite "the potential of the moving image, the story telling possibilities, the variety of delivery media", which he calls "enormous".
Source
Commonwealth Broadcaster: The Magazine of the Commonwealth Broadcasting Association, February-April 2002, page 12.
Placed on the Communication Initiative site April 29 2003
Last Updated April 30 2003
How useful did you find the knowledge and contacts on this page to your work?
Post your comments (review comments from others below):
COMMENTS POSTED
It's good to see the question of the relationship between traditional media (radio/TV) and new media (web/mobiles) being raised. Information and communication technologies are obviously vital for the future - and can provide a way of making low cost situationally relevant content. However, as Jim said, radio (in particular) can do this just as well. And a radio costs a lot less than a computer. There is also the question of the skills built up over the years by educational broadcasting units. They're unlikely to flourish in a straight commercial (ie music) world - but have a great deal of expertise to offer in terms of making content accessible -in whatever format.
Hamish Norbrook
(Hamish.Norbrook@bbc.co.uk)
Could be more useful if the original source gives his URL or mailbox.