ClassifiedsAbout Us |
Average Rating: no ratings submitted
Maternal Education and Child HealthPublication DateFebruary 1998 SummaryIntroduction Key Points The authors note that most studies based on the full DHS or World Fertility Surveys (WFS) have shown relatively strong correlations between maternal education and child health and survival. It has previously been argued that this results from one of two potential paths: Either education enhances the use of modern health services, and/or education results in a range of favourable behaviours related to child care. Yet several studies have shown that child mortality has declined over time equally across all educational groups within certain countries, and, further, that some reductions have occurred despite stationary maternal educational levels. The authors introduce several complex statistical models, all of which employ the three previously mentioned dependent variables. In all cases the mother's education is the main independent variable, with varying controls that include urban residency, father's education, whether or not the mother has a partner, and household variables such as the presence of piped water and toilets. The authors used a regression model that divided residency into one of two groups, a low-education cluster and a high-education cluster (based on DHS community-level data). They found that in almost all countries mothers with secondary educations failed to benefit from their higher educations if they lived in low-education clusters; conversely, women (and their children) with limited education benefited from being in high education clusters. The major regressions using the control variables also revealed that education was not as strong of an explanatory feature once other factors were controlled for. Assessments of infant mortality revealed that maternal educational differences were substantially reduced when other socioeconomic variables were introduced. Depending on the model employed, education was found to be significant in only 14 to 7 of the 22 countries studied, and the remaining statistically significant correlations were in almost all cases substantially weakened. Height-for-age data revealed a similar phenomenon: In the original non-controlled model it was shown to be correlated with maternal education, but after adding other socioeconomic factors the incidence of significance is also weakened. In the third model the strength of the relationships were only one-third as large as those in the original model. Immunisation status has also been regularly correlated with maternal education, and the authors sought to evaluate this variable because it provides insight into health-seeking behaviour rather than child health outcomes. The authors used an index that included three doses of polio vaccine, three doses of DPT (diptheria-pertussis-tetanus), a measles vaccination, and Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG). What the authors found was that maternal education remains statistically significant even after controlling for other factors in the 2nd and 3rd models. Declines in coefficients (the strength of the relationship) across the models are relatively small. The authors note that higher vaccination levels do not necessarily translate into improvements in mortality rates or anthropometric indices. The authors conclude that maternal education, while important in effecting the health seeking behaviour of mothers, does not have a substantial effect on actual health outcomes. They do, however, note several limitations, one of which is that, while small, the effect of maternal education remained significant in a handful of countries (especially in Latin America) and coefficients consistently moved in the expected direction. Furthermore, they note that this study highlights two possible alternative routes through which maternal education contributes to child health: first, that education may effect access to health facilities at the community level (as higher educated populaces tend to come together and draw in better services) which also benefits those lower educated mothers who live in the area; and secondly, that the higher immunisation rates among children of better-educated mothers will reduce disease incidence. The conclusion is that, while investment in women's education is vitally important to development, it cannot override various other socioeconomic and structural hamstrings that may prevent even educated mothers from affording their children the best levels of childcare. The authors note that a lack of critical attention to this fact can result in unrealistic expectations of mothers and increases in their already substantial burden levels. Thus, maternal education projects must be matched with comprehensive service provision and other forms of health development. ContactSonalde Desai
Associate Professor, Department of Sociology University of Maryland, College Park 2112 Art-Sociology Building College Park, MD 20742 USA Tel.: (301) 405-6312 Fax: (301) 314-6892 sdesai@socy.umd.edu SourceSonalde Desai* and Domuya Alva*. 1998. "Maternal Education and Child Health: Is There a Strong Causal Relationship?" Demography, Vol. 35, No. 1, pps. 71-81. * Center on Population, Gender and Social Inequality, University of Maryland at College Park Placed on the Communication Initiative site October 04 2004 Last Updated October 04 2004 Top 5 Related Pages for this Summary |
User loginRegister and ParticipatePollPolio News |