| Advanced Search |
Knowledge SectionsE-magazinesThe CI PartnersClassifiedsAbout Us |
Average Rating: 4 out of 5 (1 ratings submitted)
Impact Data - VERB CampaignCountry
United States
DateAugust 2005 ContextThe VERB campaign was a multiethnic social marketing campaign that combined paid advertisements with school and community promotions and internet activities to encourage children 9 to 13 years of age to be physically active every day. Launched in 2002 by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), VERB used commercial marketing methods to advertise being physically active as cool, fun, and a chance to have a good time with friends. The campaign ran from 2002 through September 2006 when funding was not continued. The evaluations being summarised here focus on a selected time frame within the ongoing VERB campaign; it involved paid advertising using the VERB brand that ran nationally from June 2002 through June 2004. VERB was based on the premise that a physically active lifestyle, if established at this young age, could lessen the decline in physical activity typically seen in the high school years, especially among girls. (Self-reported data indicate that almost one quarter of children 9 to 13 years of age engage in no free-time physical activity during a typical week, and approximately one third of high school students are insufficiently physically active - with girls less active than boys and Hispanic and black high school students less active than their white peers). In addition, the CDC reasons, active children are more likely to become active adults, which could have with immediate and long-term health benefits, including weight control, lower blood pressure, bone health, and enhanced psychological well-being. MethodologiesA prospective, longitudinal, quasi-experimental design was used. A baseline survey was conducted in April to June 2002, before the launch of VERB advertising. Random-digit-dialing methods were used to survey a nationally representative sample of children and parents. The follow-up survey was repeated with the same cohort of children and parents (a total of 3,120 parent-child dyads) in April to June 2003 and in April to June 2004. To continue to assess effects in the target age of the campaign, a new cohort was interviewed in 2004 (cohort 2; n=5177). Propensity scoring was used to determine the campaign's effects on awareness and physical activity behaviours. AccessThe 2-year period of the campaign being evaluated here produced high levels of awareness, based on a 5-category measure of reported frequency of seeing the campaign. Among 9-13 year olds in cohort 2, 81% reported being aware of the campaign. Of those aware, 96% had understanding of the campaign messages. Practices
Effect sizes for the awareness effect on behavior were r=0.07 for median number of weekly sessions of free-time physical activity, r=0.12 for physical activity on the day before the interview, and r=0.06 for organized physical activity. Other Impacts
ContactMarian Huhman
VERB Campaign Evaluation
University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign
244 Lincoln Hall
Urbana IL
61801
United States
Related SummariesSourceEmail from Suzanne Gates to the Hollywood, Health & Society's Entertainment Education List Serve dated Monday August 8 2005; "Effects of a Mass Media Campaign to Increase Physical Activity Among Children: Year-1 Results of the VERB Campaign", by Marian Huhman, PhD, Lance D. Potter, MA, Faye L. Wong, MPH, Stephen W. Banspach, PhD, Jennifer C. Duke, PhD and Carrie D. Heitzler, MPH. Pediatrics, Vol. 116 No. 2 August 2005, pp. e277-e284; and Huhman ME, Potter LD, Duke JC, Judkins DR, Heitzler CD, Wong FL. "Evaluation of a national physical activity intervention for children: The VERB Campaign 2002-2004". Am J Prev Med 2007;32(1):38-43. Placed on the Communication Initiative site March 30 2006 Last Updated February 22 2008 How useful did you find the knowledge and contacts on this page to your work? Post your comments (review comments from others below):COMMENTS POSTED |
Special FocusJournalist/Reader Connection
What are the best possibilities for journalist-readership connections? (you may choose more than one; please add clarifying comments)
|