Comments and Questions Related to ChangeNet: The Lessons from Obama's campaign for International Development Democracy and Governance Policy and Action
Very interesting post as a community nurse I often think about this thing called community and the need to communicate with individuals and groups. I've started to reflect on some aspects of 'poverty' across four domains of knowledge: intra-interpersonal, social, sciences and political. I may add to the first two posts having read your text Warren. Don't be too quick to wright(?) yourself off - the older generations (and yes that 's' there is important) still have a major role to distilling and disseminating values whilst keeping themselves active and well.
Many thanks
Peter Jones
Lancashire
UK
-- http://hodges-model.blogspot.com/
Hodges Health Career - Care Domains - Model http://www.p-jones.demon.co.uk/
h2cm: help 2C more - help 2 listen - help 2 care http://twitter.com/h2cm
In fairness, Howard Dean, in the 2002-3 camapaign used the web far ahead of the curve.
He had blogs and alerts and forums (fora). They actually had a bunch of very innovative SW writers incl. one college student who did an effort to "let good ideas Bubble up" from the larger community, for attention of the campaign. This sounds like running the campaign by polls, but it's not. Polls ask pre determined questions, Dean for America used the online discussions to distill the insights - things the campaign did NOT think of, but might want to think on.
Though social networking may have contributed enormously to the election and reinvigorated the US democratic process for the moment, like the digital divide we often notice, there is still the dilemma of bringing in the voices of the marginalised. My neighbourhood experience with those still on dial-up vs. those with highspeed, here in a comparative rural paradise of equality, has heightened my awareness of the subtlety of disenfranchisement, especially now, when it surfaces most noticeably in US politics. While we are admiring Obama's marriage of community organising to the internet, there is still room for amplifying voices of those who feel they need to paint "maverick" on their chests to be noticed and heard, because they may not contribute to a digital conversation. Siobhan Warrington in "Celebrating the Uncelebrated" http://www.comminit.com/en/node/279229 and other contributions on oral testimony captures the need to be active in seeking out those who are not part of the majority anymore.
Though I think that there were many other elements contributing to Obama's success (his grace, his intelligence, smart advisors, Howard Dean's National Democratic Party strategies, the destruction(s) of the past 8 years), I agree with your assessment of the lessons to be learned related to new technologies and community development within his campaign. Fundamental change occured in the United States of America on Tuesday, November 4 2008. However, that change wasn't just because of Obama's campaign - it's been a long time coming. I am hopeful that Obama will be able to move forward with the changes he spoke of in his campaign, but that will require new strategies, perhaps, and different lessons. Aren't the lessons you refer to here specific to an election campaign, and not to governance, in general? Effective governance - will that be possible through creative use of the new technologies and a focus on community organising strategies?
I certainly agree that Obama used interactive technologies to engage people in ways that were never before possible. This definitely played a role in mobilising youth - even those not old enough to vote, like my friend's 8-year-old son whose teacher used new technologies as well as "old school" classroom activities, to organise mock elections, etc. (See also the article "Kids Speak out on Election in iReport Videos" - http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/16/kids.election.irpt/index.html?ere...). However, I was certainly impacted by the volunteer who knocked on my porch door, the phone call asking if Obama could count on my vote, and the college students holding Obama signs and waving at the only stoplight in town as cars honked and waved. My mom, who (like McCain) is not a computer user, was just as adamant Obama supporter as I. So I do think that - while the international community may draw on some rich lessons from this campaign - the picture is quite complex, which only gives hope to those trying to reach people in places where new technologies do not yet have a stronghold.
Point well made on Obama's use of communication technology. A further example: a neighbour and his Blackberry volunteered on election day in the former red state of NH. His job was to enter and send to the local Dem headquarters numerical data representing the names of those who had voted in his precinct as they exited the polling location. They were then removed from the phone list of get-out-the-vote calling that was being done there by other volunteers at the headquarters. Voila, NH turned blue.
And just to further set the record straight, our former VT governor, Howard Dean, now chair of the Democrats, is, without a doubt, the father of internet use in campaigning.
It is interesting that Obama brought in one of the founders of facebook to lead his online networking. The engagement of so many in a process that inspired while also leaving them free to interpret the politics, policies and priorities of the campaign within their own reality and using a campaign web site together with facebook, twitter etc. This will create a lot of impetus to keep things going beyond the election. Many groups that have formed around an issue or region will monitor what he does as president and want to be part of an ongoing process that does not end as Obama himself said with the election.
Possibly a nightmare for the traditionalists who feel controlling the message is essential but a new day for those who see an opening to a new form of democratic engagement. A lot changed with this election perhaps in ways we haven't yet fully digested...
Relative poverty - across multicontexts
Very interesting post as a community nurse I often think about this thing called community and the need to communicate with individuals and groups. I've started to reflect on some aspects of 'poverty' across four domains of knowledge: intra-interpersonal, social, sciences and political. I may add to the first two posts having read your text Warren. Don't be too quick to wright(?) yourself off - the older generations (and yes that 's' there is important) still have a major role to distilling and disseminating values whilst keeping themselves active and well.
Many thanks
Peter Jones
Lancashire
UK
--
http://hodges-model.blogspot.com/
Hodges Health Career - Care Domains - Model
http://www.p-jones.demon.co.uk/
h2cm: help 2C more - help 2 listen - help 2 care
http://twitter.com/h2cm
campaigns and the Web
In fairness, Howard Dean, in the 2002-3 camapaign used the web far ahead of the curve.
He had blogs and alerts and forums (fora). They actually had a bunch of very innovative SW writers incl. one college student who did an effort to "let good ideas Bubble up" from the larger community, for attention of the campaign. This sounds like running the campaign by polls, but it's not. Polls ask pre determined questions, Dean for America used the online discussions to distill the insights - things the campaign did NOT think of, but might want to think on.
Sounds like something we should be doing, hmm?
Fred Fleming
f11501@verizon.net
Once in 12-15 years tired
Once in 12-15 years tired people in the society have a vital need for change, using that needs politicals like Obama can come to power. Be aware...
Artem
Will Obama bring change?
I wonder what the shape of the changes that Obama will bring forth.
Palin's Mavericks
Though social networking may have contributed enormously to the election and reinvigorated the US democratic process for the moment, like the digital divide we often notice, there is still the dilemma of bringing in the voices of the marginalised. My neighbourhood experience with those still on dial-up vs. those with highspeed, here in a comparative rural paradise of equality, has heightened my awareness of the subtlety of disenfranchisement, especially now, when it surfaces most noticeably in US politics. While we are admiring Obama's marriage of community organising to the internet, there is still room for amplifying voices of those who feel they need to paint "maverick" on their chests to be noticed and heard, because they may not contribute to a digital conversation. Siobhan Warrington in "Celebrating the Uncelebrated" http://www.comminit.com/en/node/279229 and other contributions on oral testimony captures the need to be active in seeking out those who are not part of the majority anymore.
Very interesting post.
Very interesting post. Thanks for the info.
Are these lessons for governance? Or just for campaigns?
Though I think that there were many other elements contributing to Obama's success (his grace, his intelligence, smart advisors, Howard Dean's National Democratic Party strategies, the destruction(s) of the past 8 years), I agree with your assessment of the lessons to be learned related to new technologies and community development within his campaign. Fundamental change occured in the United States of America on Tuesday, November 4 2008. However, that change wasn't just because of Obama's campaign - it's been a long time coming. I am hopeful that Obama will be able to move forward with the changes he spoke of in his campaign, but that will require new strategies, perhaps, and different lessons. Aren't the lessons you refer to here specific to an election campaign, and not to governance, in general? Effective governance - will that be possible through creative use of the new technologies and a focus on community organising strategies?
Response to Warren on Obama
I certainly agree that Obama used interactive technologies to engage people in ways that were never before possible. This definitely played a role in mobilising youth - even those not old enough to vote, like my friend's 8-year-old son whose teacher used new technologies as well as "old school" classroom activities, to organise mock elections, etc. (See also the article "Kids Speak out on Election in iReport Videos" - http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/16/kids.election.irpt/index.html?ere...). However, I was certainly impacted by the volunteer who knocked on my porch door, the phone call asking if Obama could count on my vote, and the college students holding Obama signs and waving at the only stoplight in town as cars honked and waved. My mom, who (like McCain) is not a computer user, was just as adamant Obama supporter as I. So I do think that - while the international community may draw on some rich lessons from this campaign - the picture is quite complex, which only gives hope to those trying to reach people in places where new technologies do not yet have a stronghold.
ChangeNet
Point well made on Obama's use of communication technology. A further example: a neighbour and his Blackberry volunteered on election day in the former red state of NH. His job was to enter and send to the local Dem headquarters numerical data representing the names of those who had voted in his precinct as they exited the polling location. They were then removed from the phone list of get-out-the-vote calling that was being done there by other volunteers at the headquarters. Voila, NH turned blue.
And just to further set the record straight, our former VT governor, Howard Dean, now chair of the Democrats, is, without a doubt, the father of internet use in campaigning.
Is facebook reshaping politics?
It is interesting that Obama brought in one of the founders of facebook to lead his online networking. The engagement of so many in a process that inspired while also leaving them free to interpret the politics, policies and priorities of the campaign within their own reality and using a campaign web site together with facebook, twitter etc. This will create a lot of impetus to keep things going beyond the election. Many groups that have formed around an issue or region will monitor what he does as president and want to be part of an ongoing process that does not end as Obama himself said with the election.
Possibly a nightmare for the traditionalists who feel controlling the message is essential but a new day for those who see an opening to a new form of democratic engagement. A lot changed with this election perhaps in ways we haven't yet fully digested...