Choose a site:

The Communication Initiative Network

Where communication and media are central to social and economic development

GLOBAL|Approaches|Tools|Issues|Regions/Countries|MDGs|Polls / Discussions

E-magazines

Upcoming Events


Average Rating: no ratings submitted

Managing Mobilisation? Participatory Processes and Dam Building in South Africa, the Berg River Project

Author

Lisa Thompson

Institute of Development Studies (IDS)

Publication Date

November 2005

Summary

This 47-page research paper on water resource management focuses on the attempt by some countries to neutralise criticism of their water management policies by creating formal spaces for public consultation and participation. This study looks at the participatory processes (specifically, how local people were consulted and involved) in the building of the Berg River Dam, Berg Water Project (BWP), in South Africa’s Western Cape province. The author analyses the consultations that led to the approval of the dam and concludes that the creation of formal participatory spaces both subverted and neutralised resistance, on the part of the environmental movement, as well as civil society, to the building of the dam.

From the Institute for Development Studies Research Summary of IDS Working Paper 254:

"In the early to mid-1990s, the provincial government asked all ‘interested and affected’ parties to discuss options for solving the Western Cape’s ‘water crisis’...[in] an attempt to democratise the decision-making process... [on] a range of options for dealing with water ‘scarcity’ in the province, including its own preferred option. At the same time, an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) on the entire project was carried out and made public. Both processes (the WCSA and the EIA) appear to show a high level of government commitment... But on closer inspection, these... served to legitimise the building of the dam while only appearing to give local communities a say in decisions."

The research in this document concluded, among other points, that:

  • "Scientific notions of ‘scarcity’ at both global and national levels are often used to justify government policies for managing water resources.
  • Formal, government-driven processes served to undermine potential activism around opposition...
  • People [need] means to question the official line on water ‘scarcity’ and to meaningfully process or question [information].
  • Global environmental debates have... influence on policies and processes,... but government commitment to international protocols and guidelines needs to be followed through and demonstrated in local policies and practice.
  • There is a tension between the science of managing scarce natural resources and the language of people’s rights and empowerment.
  • So-called ‘democratic spaces’ created by government can weaken the impetus of voluntary forms of social mobilisation and resistance...
  • The links between local and national activists’ networks in South Africa were insufficient to mobilise a mass social movement in opposition to the dam."

Contact

Lisa Thompson, Communications Unit
Institute of Development Studies
University of Sussex
Brighton BN1 9RE
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 0 1273 678269
Fax: +44 0 1273 621202
bookshop@ids.ac.uk
lthompson@uwc.ac.za
The Institute of Development Studies website

Placed on the Communication Initiative site May 09 2006
Last Updated October 16 2007

How useful did you find this page to your work?

1 - not useful    5 - very useful
Feel free to leave us comments
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Register and Participate

Subscribe to The Drum Beat, Contribute to Forums, Get Poll Results etc
New to CI? » Start here

User login

Help Seed The CI Network

Poll